Grass Roots North Carolina / Forum For Firearms Education
Post Office Box 10684, Raleigh, NC 27605
919.664.8565 / 919.562.4137 (Fax) www.GRNC.org
Contact: F. Paul Valone, President, Grass Roots North Carolina*
Telephone: 704.907.9206
E-mail: president@GRNC.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 6/29/2010
* *
GRNC Joins Suit Against North Carolina Gun Ban
Lawsuit follows Supreme Court McDonald v. Chicago decision
RALEIGH, NC – Grass Roots North Carolina has joined Michael Bateman, Virgil Green, Forrest Minges, Jr., and the Second Amendment Foundation in a lawsuit against the state’s emergency powers gun ban.
Named in the suit are North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue; Reuben Young, secretary of the Department of Crime Control and Public Safety; Stokes County and the City of King.
Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the lawsuit contends state statutes forbidding carrying of firearms and ammunition during declared states of emergency, as well as laws enabling government officials to prohibit purchase, sale and possession of firearms and ammunition are unconstitutional because they forbid the exercise of Second Amendment rights as affirmed by Monday’s Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. Chicago.
Plaintiffs are represented by attorney *_Alan Gura_*, who won the recent McDonald v. Chicago Second Amendment case and the landmark D.C. v. Heller case preceding it. Local counsel includes Andrew Tripp and Kearns Davis of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLC.
Background:
· Since 2004, at least 12 states of emergency have been declared, especially in the state’s hurricane-prone coastal areas.
· In February King, NC declared a state of emergency for impending snowfall, posting signs prohibiting the carriage and sale of firearms and ammunition, infringing upon its citizens’ Second Amendment rights.
· On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of applying Second Amendment scrutiny to state gun laws.
Says GRNC president Paul Valone:
“North Carolina’s legislature has chosen to infringe upon citizens’ ability to protect themselves and their families in times of need. When King, North Carolina banned guns and ammunition in response to pending snowfall, it clearly highlighted the unconstitutional restrictions endured by lawful North Carolinians.”
Grass Roots North Carolina
GRNC is an all-volunteer non-profit dedicated to preserving individual freedoms guaranteed by the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. Since 1994, GRNC has conducted grass roots mobilization on legislation impacting Second Amendment issues, as well as voter education and through the GRNC Political Victory Fund, election action to further legislative goals.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
The Next Case After McDonald v. Chicago
The ink is hardly dry on McDonald and Alan Gura and the SAF are already making their next move, this time in North Carolina.
This time, they are seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of NC's law allowing the suspension of the RKBA in the event of a declared emergency.
{H/T Snowflakes in Hell}
This time, they are seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of NC's law allowing the suspension of the RKBA in the event of a declared emergency.
{H/T Snowflakes in Hell}
Monday, June 28, 2010
More Thoughts on McDonald v. Chicago
IMO, the McDonald decision is interesting for several reasons:
1. The right to keep and bear arms (RKBA) is recognized as a "fundamental right," which places it on par with freedom of speech and freedom of religion, among others. Although the level of scrutiny wasn't specified, I'll be very surprised to see anything less than strict scrutiny apply.
Strict scrutiny won't necessarily void gun registration schemes, but it will void outright bans, discretionary licensing requirements (see Scalia's discussion of "arbitrary and capricious" licensing requirements in Heller), and prohibitive taxes or licensing fees.
It should also void the Lautenberg Amendment, which extend the class of prohibited persons to those convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence crimes. AFAIK, this is the only instance when a fundamental right is revoked based upon a misdemeanor.
Related to the above, the court's recognition of the Second Amendment as protecting the RKBA especially as it relates to the right of self defense may prove to be the undoing of the "sporting purposes" requirement in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922.
2. Alito discussed in detail the intent of the 14th Amendment's framers to protect the RKBA of recently freed slaves, which was being restricted by gun control laws in the South. The racist roots of gun control laws are clearly laid out in this opinion.
3. Scalia's concurring opinion was more about eviscerating Stevens' dissent than taking another tack on incorporation. Scalia absolutely trashed Stevens' judicial philosophy.
I would really like to have dinner with Scalia. :-)
4. Thomas concurred in the result but felt that the Second Amendment should have been incorporated via the Privileges or Immunities Clause, essentially overruling The Slaughterhouse Cases. At least since the mid-90s (when I took ConLaw in my 2L year), academics have viewed the reasoning in Slaughterhouse as bogus. My own reaction upon reading it was, "WTF?!?" I suspect the reason the court declined to follow this road to incorporation was that they weren't able to get at least 5 justices to agree to it. So, they took the safe way out.
5. None of the justices in the minority on Heller voted in McDonald to incorporate the Second Amendment, despite the fact that Heller established the individual nature of the right. Instead, they continued to fight tooth and nail against extending the protection of the 2A to all Americans, letting their own personal ideologies overcome their judicial reasoning (such as it is). Shame on them.
What now?
Well, despite what the mainstream news is reporting, the court in McDonald did NOT strike down Chicago's handgun ban. Rather, it remanded the case to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had previously upheld the trial court's dismissal of the case. So, the case can now either go back down to the district court level for trial or perhaps the appellate court can rule on whether the Chicago law violates the Second Amendment.
It's quite possible that Chicago will revise the law to bring it into what it feels is compliance with the constitution, but this fight isn't over by a long shot. A lot of how McDonald proceeds will depend upon how many taxpayer dollars Fuhrer Daley wants to waste.
Aside from the Chicago law, others are now ripe for being challenged, including the draconian and arbitrary pistol ownership licensing schemes in places like NYC, CA, and NJ. Additionally, the assault weapons bans in NY, NJ and CA are in jeopardy.
With the Second Amendment now recognized as protecting a fundamental right, discretionary carry license laws such as those in NY, NJ, MD, and CA may also eventually be replaced with shall-issue laws.
But no matter what, we need to recognize that the enemies of freedom have never given ground willingly, and we still have a long fight ahead of us.
Edit 6/29/10: This post seems to be generating a lot of visits. If you're new to this blog, welcome, and please do check out the rest of my posts.
1. The right to keep and bear arms (RKBA) is recognized as a "fundamental right," which places it on par with freedom of speech and freedom of religion, among others. Although the level of scrutiny wasn't specified, I'll be very surprised to see anything less than strict scrutiny apply.
Strict scrutiny won't necessarily void gun registration schemes, but it will void outright bans, discretionary licensing requirements (see Scalia's discussion of "arbitrary and capricious" licensing requirements in Heller), and prohibitive taxes or licensing fees.
It should also void the Lautenberg Amendment, which extend the class of prohibited persons to those convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence crimes. AFAIK, this is the only instance when a fundamental right is revoked based upon a misdemeanor.
Related to the above, the court's recognition of the Second Amendment as protecting the RKBA especially as it relates to the right of self defense may prove to be the undoing of the "sporting purposes" requirement in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922.
2. Alito discussed in detail the intent of the 14th Amendment's framers to protect the RKBA of recently freed slaves, which was being restricted by gun control laws in the South. The racist roots of gun control laws are clearly laid out in this opinion.
3. Scalia's concurring opinion was more about eviscerating Stevens' dissent than taking another tack on incorporation. Scalia absolutely trashed Stevens' judicial philosophy.
I would really like to have dinner with Scalia. :-)
4. Thomas concurred in the result but felt that the Second Amendment should have been incorporated via the Privileges or Immunities Clause, essentially overruling The Slaughterhouse Cases. At least since the mid-90s (when I took ConLaw in my 2L year), academics have viewed the reasoning in Slaughterhouse as bogus. My own reaction upon reading it was, "WTF?!?" I suspect the reason the court declined to follow this road to incorporation was that they weren't able to get at least 5 justices to agree to it. So, they took the safe way out.
5. None of the justices in the minority on Heller voted in McDonald to incorporate the Second Amendment, despite the fact that Heller established the individual nature of the right. Instead, they continued to fight tooth and nail against extending the protection of the 2A to all Americans, letting their own personal ideologies overcome their judicial reasoning (such as it is). Shame on them.
What now?
Well, despite what the mainstream news is reporting, the court in McDonald did NOT strike down Chicago's handgun ban. Rather, it remanded the case to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had previously upheld the trial court's dismissal of the case. So, the case can now either go back down to the district court level for trial or perhaps the appellate court can rule on whether the Chicago law violates the Second Amendment.
It's quite possible that Chicago will revise the law to bring it into what it feels is compliance with the constitution, but this fight isn't over by a long shot. A lot of how McDonald proceeds will depend upon how many taxpayer dollars Fuhrer Daley wants to waste.
Aside from the Chicago law, others are now ripe for being challenged, including the draconian and arbitrary pistol ownership licensing schemes in places like NYC, CA, and NJ. Additionally, the assault weapons bans in NY, NJ and CA are in jeopardy.
With the Second Amendment now recognized as protecting a fundamental right, discretionary carry license laws such as those in NY, NJ, MD, and CA may also eventually be replaced with shall-issue laws.
But no matter what, we need to recognize that the enemies of freedom have never given ground willingly, and we still have a long fight ahead of us.
Edit 6/29/10: This post seems to be generating a lot of visits. If you're new to this blog, welcome, and please do check out the rest of my posts.
McDonald v. Chicago - WE WON!
SCOTUS just released their opinion in McDonald v. Chicago, which challenged Chicago's handgun ban. The court held that the Second Amendment DOES apply to the states, based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
As expected the decision was 5 to 4.
Full text of the decision is here:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf
I haven't yet read the entire decision, and will offer more comments after having done so.
As expected the decision was 5 to 4.
Full text of the decision is here:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf
I haven't yet read the entire decision, and will offer more comments after having done so.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Another Wheelgun Night at the Range
Having been laid low with a sinus infection for most of the past week and a half, I really needed to do something enjoyable. So, Saturday night I went the to range with my dad and did some shooting.
As is usual for our Saturday night range trips, we stopped at Wal Mart to see what ammo they had in stock. Dad wanted to pick up some .45 ACP for his Colt 1911, since he'd shot all of his handloads. No dice there, so he just wound up shooting his S&W Military & Police 9mm. (We noticed they had plenty of 9mm and .40 S&W.)
I picked up three boxes of Winchester white box .38 Special 125 grain JHP +Ps, and a single box of Remington .38 Special 130 grain ball.
I brought two guns with my tonight. First was a World War II vintage S&W Victory Model Military & Police .38 Special which I bought back in May. Additionally, I brought along my S&W Model 28-2 .357.
This was my first time shooting the Victory Model. As expected it runs like a champ and is very accurate. I put a 50 round box of Winchester 148 grain wadcutters into one fist-sized hole at 7 yards shooting double action. Dad put a couple cylinders through it, making a rather small one hole group. The action is extremely smooth, especially considering it's unlikely that gun has been shot much, based on its exterior condition.
Aside from the wadcutters I put two or three cylinders-full of the 130 grain Remington loads through it. I bought this ammo mainly out of curiousity, never having tried this GI-type load before. It's hotter than the 148 wadcutter load and with the old style skinny service grips, the Victory Model wacks my hand with them.
After putting around a box and half of ammo through the Victory Model I took out the Model 28. Dad's range doesn't permit shooting magnum loads indoors, so I shot it with .38s. Wadcutters are real easy shooting in the big N-Frame, while the 130 grain Ball loads were still very pleasant to shoot. I also ran about a half box of the WWB .38 125 grain +Ps through it. They, too, aren't bad to shoot in that gun.
Since my last range trip a few weeks ago, I'd replaced the Herrett's Shooting Star wood grips on the Model 28 with a set of Pachymar Presentation grips I had in my spare parts stash. I'd originally bought them for a 1937 Brazilian contract S&W .45 ACP revolver. I'll be taking them off. They cover the backstrap, which makes the trigger reach too long for me and throws off the gun's balance. I may buy a set of Pachymar Grippers with an expose backstrap. I have a set of these on my S&W Model 625, so I know they're comfortable.
As is usual for our Saturday night range trips, we stopped at Wal Mart to see what ammo they had in stock. Dad wanted to pick up some .45 ACP for his Colt 1911, since he'd shot all of his handloads. No dice there, so he just wound up shooting his S&W Military & Police 9mm. (We noticed they had plenty of 9mm and .40 S&W.)
I picked up three boxes of Winchester white box .38 Special 125 grain JHP +Ps, and a single box of Remington .38 Special 130 grain ball.
I brought two guns with my tonight. First was a World War II vintage S&W Victory Model Military & Police .38 Special which I bought back in May. Additionally, I brought along my S&W Model 28-2 .357.
| S&W Victory Model .38 Special |
This was my first time shooting the Victory Model. As expected it runs like a champ and is very accurate. I put a 50 round box of Winchester 148 grain wadcutters into one fist-sized hole at 7 yards shooting double action. Dad put a couple cylinders through it, making a rather small one hole group. The action is extremely smooth, especially considering it's unlikely that gun has been shot much, based on its exterior condition.
Aside from the wadcutters I put two or three cylinders-full of the 130 grain Remington loads through it. I bought this ammo mainly out of curiousity, never having tried this GI-type load before. It's hotter than the 148 wadcutter load and with the old style skinny service grips, the Victory Model wacks my hand with them.
After putting around a box and half of ammo through the Victory Model I took out the Model 28. Dad's range doesn't permit shooting magnum loads indoors, so I shot it with .38s. Wadcutters are real easy shooting in the big N-Frame, while the 130 grain Ball loads were still very pleasant to shoot. I also ran about a half box of the WWB .38 125 grain +Ps through it. They, too, aren't bad to shoot in that gun.
Since my last range trip a few weeks ago, I'd replaced the Herrett's Shooting Star wood grips on the Model 28 with a set of Pachymar Presentation grips I had in my spare parts stash. I'd originally bought them for a 1937 Brazilian contract S&W .45 ACP revolver. I'll be taking them off. They cover the backstrap, which makes the trigger reach too long for me and throws off the gun's balance. I may buy a set of Pachymar Grippers with an expose backstrap. I have a set of these on my S&W Model 625, so I know they're comfortable.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
New Home WiFi
This past week and a half has been a real PITA at Chez Markowitz. All of us, except my younger daughter, came down with some form of sinus/bronchial crud. I missed two and a half days of work last week, a half day this week, and still have congestion and a cough. So, when Judith called me up Monday afternoon to let me know she couldn't get online at home, and that one of my UPSes was beeping, I was not too happy.
Something caused one of our breakers to trip. After getting the UPS back online I found that the SMC 802.11n WiFi router which I've been using as an access point for the past couple of years was dead. No lights, no nothin'. So, after getting a bite to eat I took a trip down to Microcenter.
I looked over the various WiFi routers and access points they had on hand and wound up getting a Cisco-Linksys WRT54GL
. I could've gotten it cheaper at Amazon or NewEgg but didn't want to wait several days for it to arrive, since we all use wireless access daily.
I chose the WRT-54GL for a couple of reasons. First, it has a very good reputation for reliability. Second, there are several projects which are dedicated to providing open source firmware which extends the box's functionality. E.g., dd-wrt, OpenWRT, and Tomato. As explained below I'm using it only as a switch and a WAP for the time being but this might change in the future. (Note: If you're interested in putting 3rd-party firmware on a Linksys router, make sure you buy the WRT54GL.)
Why an 802.11g router instead of a new 802.11n router? Even with the 802.11n SMC, I had to keep it in g/n mode, since we have a few g-only devices. E.g., Judith's iPod Touch, my Droid, and an Apple iBook. In g/n mode I wasn't seeing any better performance than with it in n-only mode. Also, I the Linksys's Fast Ethernet ports are not a handicap for my needs, as they are plenty fast to handle my Internet connection. Internet speed tests give results about the same as before. We don't do any major file transfer between systems on the LAN. I just don't need Gig-E now.
One advantage of the SMC box was that you could put it into bridge mode, which disabled the routing functions. My router is an SMCD3G DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem/gateway, so I don't need the WiFi box to do routing. The WRT-54GL does not support this, so instead of connecting it to my SMCD3G via the WAN port, it's connected using a LAN port. The DHCP server is turned off on the Linksys so there's no conflict with the SMC's.
After using the WRT-54GL for a few days it seems like the WiFi signal coverage is a bit more uniform than the dead SMC gave me. So much for 802.11n as a range extender. Aside from wireless protocol, antenna design and transmit power play a big role in the range of one's WiFi device.
My home webserver, showebox.davemarkowitz.net, is plugged into the Linksys box. The web server has the same publicly-routable IP it's always had, while the Linksys has a private IP on the same subnet as the SMC's private LAN interface. There's no problem with running more than one network on the same wire.
Finally, along with the WiFi router, I bought a new APC UPS Monday night. My old Back UPS 650 was due for a replacement. This time I got a 1000 VA APC box, which will provide backup power to shoebox.davemarkowitz.net and the Linksys. I have another Back UPS 650 powering the SMCD3G, my Arris eMTA, and our cordless phone base unit. I can wait awhile before I'll need to replace that one.
Something caused one of our breakers to trip. After getting the UPS back online I found that the SMC 802.11n WiFi router which I've been using as an access point for the past couple of years was dead. No lights, no nothin'. So, after getting a bite to eat I took a trip down to Microcenter.
I looked over the various WiFi routers and access points they had on hand and wound up getting a Cisco-Linksys WRT54GL
I chose the WRT-54GL for a couple of reasons. First, it has a very good reputation for reliability. Second, there are several projects which are dedicated to providing open source firmware which extends the box's functionality. E.g., dd-wrt, OpenWRT, and Tomato. As explained below I'm using it only as a switch and a WAP for the time being but this might change in the future. (Note: If you're interested in putting 3rd-party firmware on a Linksys router, make sure you buy the WRT54GL.)
Why an 802.11g router instead of a new 802.11n router? Even with the 802.11n SMC, I had to keep it in g/n mode, since we have a few g-only devices. E.g., Judith's iPod Touch, my Droid, and an Apple iBook. In g/n mode I wasn't seeing any better performance than with it in n-only mode. Also, I the Linksys's Fast Ethernet ports are not a handicap for my needs, as they are plenty fast to handle my Internet connection. Internet speed tests give results about the same as before. We don't do any major file transfer between systems on the LAN. I just don't need Gig-E now.
One advantage of the SMC box was that you could put it into bridge mode, which disabled the routing functions. My router is an SMCD3G DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem/gateway, so I don't need the WiFi box to do routing. The WRT-54GL does not support this, so instead of connecting it to my SMCD3G via the WAN port, it's connected using a LAN port. The DHCP server is turned off on the Linksys so there's no conflict with the SMC's.
After using the WRT-54GL for a few days it seems like the WiFi signal coverage is a bit more uniform than the dead SMC gave me. So much for 802.11n as a range extender. Aside from wireless protocol, antenna design and transmit power play a big role in the range of one's WiFi device.
My home webserver, showebox.davemarkowitz.net, is plugged into the Linksys box. The web server has the same publicly-routable IP it's always had, while the Linksys has a private IP on the same subnet as the SMC's private LAN interface. There's no problem with running more than one network on the same wire.
Finally, along with the WiFi router, I bought a new APC UPS Monday night. My old Back UPS 650 was due for a replacement. This time I got a 1000 VA APC box, which will provide backup power to shoebox.davemarkowitz.net and the Linksys. I have another Back UPS 650 powering the SMCD3G, my Arris eMTA, and our cordless phone base unit. I can wait awhile before I'll need to replace that one.
Labels:
general suckage,
hardware,
networking,
wireless
Wednesday, June 09, 2010
Save the oceans from the Evil Oil Companies
Farm whales!
Brilliant!
My green energy solution: Factory whale farming.
We would first need to secure a large enough facility for the farm. With the recent crude oil based disaster hurting the local economy, Louisiana would be the perfect location for cheap land and labor. The New Orleans Super Dome has had a history of problems and should be closed. We should be able to purchase it for a song.
We would have to caulk the doors and ticket windows – possibly spread a layer of sealant over the entire stadium and bleacher section. There aren’t a lot of windows, so the public doesn’t have to see the slaughter house and cry about “veal production”.
Using the pre-existing pump facilities associated with the levee system, it should be easy to fill the dome with sea water. We could re-circulate the water back into the storm sewers and repeat when the smell gets bad.
The most difficult part would be catching the breeding stock of Sperm Whales. That will have to be determined later. Breeding will require large quantities of lava lamps and Berry White CDs.
Feeding will be a breeze. As Obama bows to the environmental nut-jobs and stops oil drilling in the U.S. people will need clothing. Some other ARFCOM entrepreneur will need to begin a large scale leather farm. He can supply us with dead, skinned cows to feed the sperm whales. In return, we’ll provide him ground up whale meat for fertilizer and animal feed.
Brilliant!
Gulf Oil Spill Timeline
From the UK, here is a page giving a detailed timeline of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. One thing which I've found to be very interesting is the graph at the bottom of the page comparing this spill with others. It's still dwarfed by the size of the 1991 spill engineered on the orders of Saddam Hussein, in an effort to frustrate Coalition forced in Gulf War I.
In a related note, I researched a little about ship sinkings in the Gulf of Mexico during World War II.
Although there no doubt was environmental damage, even with all that oil being spewed into the Gulf of Mexico, it wasn't killed.
I post this not to minimize or somehow negate the significance of the current oil leak, but it does provide some cause for optimism.
In a related note, I researched a little about ship sinkings in the Gulf of Mexico during World War II.
- 42 ships were attacked by U-Boats in the Gulf of Mexico during World War II.
- 25 of these were tankers.
- 28 of the 42 ships were sunk
- Another 4 were sunk in the GoM in 1943 (2 tankers and 2 freighters).
Although there no doubt was environmental damage, even with all that oil being spewed into the Gulf of Mexico, it wasn't killed.
I post this not to minimize or somehow negate the significance of the current oil leak, but it does provide some cause for optimism.
Monday, June 07, 2010
SCCSFA Junior Rifle Program
My shooting club, the Southern Chester County Sportsmen's and Farmer's Association, will be starting a junior rifle program in the Fall.
Full details here.
Full details here.
Saturday, June 05, 2010
Obama's Gulf Oil Spill
The hypocrasy of the MSM in how they are giving Obama a pass on his lack of engagement, vs. how they pilloried Bush's handling of Hurricane Katrina is telling.
As the president, Obama could help marshal resources from the Federal .gov and other oil companies and clear through bureaucratic gridlock. Instead addressing an emergency of national import, he goes on tours to promote other parts of his agenda, raise funds for political allies, and goes on vaction.
President Present, indeed.
Monday, May 24, 2010
PA to Vote on Castle Doctrine 5/25/10, Plus Three Antigun Bills
Courtesy of PAFOA:
Tomorrow, the House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on Castle Doctrine legislation – a move we’ve been waiting on since November 19 when they held a hearing! However, it comes at a price.Go to PAFOA's site for links to email the House Judiciary Committee members.
In addition to the vote on the important self-defense reforms, the committee is planning to vote on three anti-gun bills on the same day!
Contact the members of the House Judiciary Committee today. Tell them that you want their support on HB40 – the Castle Doctrine bill. This specific Castle Doctrine bill will ensure that law-abiding gun owners can feel safe knowing that they can defend themselves from attackers whether it is inside or outside your home. It also protects citizens from the expense of fighting civil lawsuits filed by criminals or their families when self-defense was justified.
But tell them that they must vote down the three gun control bills:
* HB1043 which would create a “Firearm Trafficking Czar” and lead to another bureaucratic agency looking for ways to restrict gun sales in Pennsylvania.
* HB1044 that would end preemption and allow cities to create their own gun bans and carry rules, and
* HB1045 that would arbitrarily ban certain semi-automatic firearms in the Keystone State.
Self-defense reform should not come with a price that includes gun bans, wasteful spending on a new government-funded anti-gun leader, and gutting our state’s gun laws.
Contact the members of the House Judiciary Committee today. Based on the response to Castle Doctrine in other states, we know that gun control groups will get involved in this fight, making it seem as if we will have gun fights on every street corner. As we know, such dire predictions have yet to come true. Make sure you voice is heard! Call, e-mail, or even tweet – just make sure your voice is heard!
Amazon Sales on Swiss Army Knives
FYI, Amazon is heavily discounting Swiss Army Knives
. No emergency/survival kit is complete without one. (Yes, that's an Amazon Associates link.)
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Wheelgun Night at the Range
Last night I had a good time at the range with my dad.
Not feeling like chasing brass, but feeling that it was too long since I shot it, I brought my Smith & Wesson Model 28-2 .357 Magnum revolver. As always, I also had my Three-Screw Old Model Ruger Single Six in .22 LR.
Because my dad's gun club doesn't allow .357 Magnum on their indoor range, I shot .38 Specials in the big Smith. They were Winchester-Western 148 grain wadcutter target loads, which are very mild in a K-Frame, much less an N-Frame. The Model 28 of course ran like a top and shot these loads very accurately. I have a 35 shot group fired pretty quickly double action from 7 yards which can be covered by the bottom of a soda can.
I bought the Model 28 back in the mid-nineties. I traded an Astra 75 9mm towards it, plus maybe a little cash. It has a four inch barrel and Herret's Shooting Star stocks which came of my dad's six inch Model 28 (He didn't like them, I did. Go me.)

Click the thumbnail for a larger picture.
N-Frame .357s are the bee's knees IMO. I really want to get a Model 27 with a 5" barrel but they aren't exactly growing on trees.
I ran only about 24 rounds through the Ruger, single action, one-handed. My group was about two inches. The gun might shoot a bit better with target ammo but I keep a box of Federal high speed bulk pack .22 LR in my range bag along with the gun. (I still need to snap a good picture of the Ruger.)
Dad brought along his S&W Military & Police 9 autoloader. I put 10 rounds through it. It's a nice pistol but I'm happy that I got my Springfield XD-9 instead when I decided I wanted a plastic 9mm. The XD fits my hand better. Dad also brought along his five inch S&W Model 625, an N-Frame in .45 ACP. I have an older 625 and it's probably the most accurate handgun I own. I've used it to reliably hit old rotten green peppers and apples from about 20 yards when shooting double action. Here's a picture of my Model 625:

(The knife is a Camillus Becker BK-7. The clips are RIMZ synthetic moon clips.)
Not feeling like chasing brass, but feeling that it was too long since I shot it, I brought my Smith & Wesson Model 28-2 .357 Magnum revolver. As always, I also had my Three-Screw Old Model Ruger Single Six in .22 LR.
Because my dad's gun club doesn't allow .357 Magnum on their indoor range, I shot .38 Specials in the big Smith. They were Winchester-Western 148 grain wadcutter target loads, which are very mild in a K-Frame, much less an N-Frame. The Model 28 of course ran like a top and shot these loads very accurately. I have a 35 shot group fired pretty quickly double action from 7 yards which can be covered by the bottom of a soda can.
I bought the Model 28 back in the mid-nineties. I traded an Astra 75 9mm towards it, plus maybe a little cash. It has a four inch barrel and Herret's Shooting Star stocks which came of my dad's six inch Model 28 (He didn't like them, I did. Go me.)
Click the thumbnail for a larger picture.
N-Frame .357s are the bee's knees IMO. I really want to get a Model 27 with a 5" barrel but they aren't exactly growing on trees.
I ran only about 24 rounds through the Ruger, single action, one-handed. My group was about two inches. The gun might shoot a bit better with target ammo but I keep a box of Federal high speed bulk pack .22 LR in my range bag along with the gun. (I still need to snap a good picture of the Ruger.)
Dad brought along his S&W Military & Police 9 autoloader. I put 10 rounds through it. It's a nice pistol but I'm happy that I got my Springfield XD-9 instead when I decided I wanted a plastic 9mm. The XD fits my hand better. Dad also brought along his five inch S&W Model 625, an N-Frame in .45 ACP. I have an older 625 and it's probably the most accurate handgun I own. I've used it to reliably hit old rotten green peppers and apples from about 20 yards when shooting double action. Here's a picture of my Model 625:
(The knife is a Camillus Becker BK-7. The clips are RIMZ synthetic moon clips.)
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Mac OS X to Droid Tethering Over USB
I occasionally find it handy to tether my laptop to my Droid for Internet access. I've used PDANet for this in the past but due to some kind of an update, USB tethering to my Mac broke and I have not been able to fix it. Blutetooth tethering works but it's slow.
Today I did some googling and ran across these instructions for tethering using free software. It requires a more involved setup than PDANet but it works and the speed is pretty decent, about 1.5 Mbps down x 0.45 Mbps up.
I noticed that when I terminated the tethering session, before I could reconnect I had to physically disconnect my phone from my laptop and restart the azilink program on my phone. That's a bit inconvenient but I'm willing to put up with a little quirkiness when dealing with free software.
Edit 5/23/10:
I'd call this pretty darn acceptable:
Today I did some googling and ran across these instructions for tethering using free software. It requires a more involved setup than PDANet but it works and the speed is pretty decent, about 1.5 Mbps down x 0.45 Mbps up.
I noticed that when I terminated the tethering session, before I could reconnect I had to physically disconnect my phone from my laptop and restart the azilink program on my phone. That's a bit inconvenient but I'm willing to put up with a little quirkiness when dealing with free software.
Edit 5/23/10:
I'd call this pretty darn acceptable:
Labels:
Droid,
Mac,
networking,
software,
tethering
Friday, May 14, 2010
Book Review: A Frozen Hell
Recently I finished reading A Frozen Hell: The Russo-Finnish Winter War of 1939-1940
by William Trotter. I'd rate this as one of the best books on military history that I've read.
Trotter does a very good job of covering the background to the Winter War, explaining both the then-recent history of Finland and the geopolitical situation in the months leading up to the war. He also provides a good background on Stalin's motives as the aggressor.
Notably, Trotter devotes an entire chapter to Marshall Carl Gustav Emil Mannerheim, Finland's military commander. Mannerheim was an interesting character. Born of Swedish-speaking Finiish nobility in 1867, he served in the Tsar's army from the 1880s through the end of World War I, until Finland's independence. He was a bit of an anachronism, but for Finland, he was the right man at the right time, though not without his faults. For example, during the Continuation War (1941 - 1944) he had a problem with micro-managment which may have lead to his being surprised by the Soviet 1944 Karelian offensive. Being overly focused on minutae lead to his missing larger developments.
The Winter War is a classic David-and-Goliath story. This is true not only because of the disparate sizes of the belligerants, but also because of the disparity in armaments. The Finns held on against the gigantic Soviet onslaught for over three months not only in spite of incredibly lop sided numbers, but also lacking any significant armor, minimal artillery, and hardly any airpower. Even looking at weapons organic to infantry units, the Finns were ill-equipped. Supplies of anti-tank weapons and ammunition were low. It was a combination of the Finns' sisu (guts/grit/intestinal fortitude), excellent leadership, and mind-boggling Soviet incompetence which enabled the Finns to hang on against staggering odds and dish out far more than they got.
The Soviets' poor performance can be ultimately blamed on poor leadership. Much of that can be blamed on Stalin, whose purges gutted the Red Army's officer corps during the mid-1930s. Political reliability was valued more than military competence. Thus, unrealistic, idealogy-driven assessments of the Finns lead to unrealistic military goals, insufficient planning, and hampered battlefield decision making, since tactical decisions had to be approved by unit political officers. Political correctness took precendence over reality. One might not that we could learn something from this in confronting the social and economic issues of 2010 America.
If you're looking for a good recounting of the story of a war with which too many Americans are unfamiliar, pick up a copy of A Frozen Hell: The Russo-Finnish Winter War of 1939-1940
.
by William Trotter. I'd rate this as one of the best books on military history that I've read.
Trotter does a very good job of covering the background to the Winter War, explaining both the then-recent history of Finland and the geopolitical situation in the months leading up to the war. He also provides a good background on Stalin's motives as the aggressor.
Notably, Trotter devotes an entire chapter to Marshall Carl Gustav Emil Mannerheim, Finland's military commander. Mannerheim was an interesting character. Born of Swedish-speaking Finiish nobility in 1867, he served in the Tsar's army from the 1880s through the end of World War I, until Finland's independence. He was a bit of an anachronism, but for Finland, he was the right man at the right time, though not without his faults. For example, during the Continuation War (1941 - 1944) he had a problem with micro-managment which may have lead to his being surprised by the Soviet 1944 Karelian offensive. Being overly focused on minutae lead to his missing larger developments.
The Winter War is a classic David-and-Goliath story. This is true not only because of the disparate sizes of the belligerants, but also because of the disparity in armaments. The Finns held on against the gigantic Soviet onslaught for over three months not only in spite of incredibly lop sided numbers, but also lacking any significant armor, minimal artillery, and hardly any airpower. Even looking at weapons organic to infantry units, the Finns were ill-equipped. Supplies of anti-tank weapons and ammunition were low. It was a combination of the Finns' sisu (guts/grit/intestinal fortitude), excellent leadership, and mind-boggling Soviet incompetence which enabled the Finns to hang on against staggering odds and dish out far more than they got.
The Soviets' poor performance can be ultimately blamed on poor leadership. Much of that can be blamed on Stalin, whose purges gutted the Red Army's officer corps during the mid-1930s. Political reliability was valued more than military competence. Thus, unrealistic, idealogy-driven assessments of the Finns lead to unrealistic military goals, insufficient planning, and hampered battlefield decision making, since tactical decisions had to be approved by unit political officers. Political correctness took precendence over reality. One might not that we could learn something from this in confronting the social and economic issues of 2010 America.
If you're looking for a good recounting of the story of a war with which too many Americans are unfamiliar, pick up a copy of A Frozen Hell: The Russo-Finnish Winter War of 1939-1940
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
SCCSFA June Muzzleloading Rifle Match
The Southern Chester County (PA) Sportsmens' and Farmers' Association will be holding a muzzleloading rifle match on June 24, 2010. Full details including directions to the club can be viewed here.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
I'm Not Dead
Long time, no post.
While waiting for me to come up with something of interest for this site, you might be interested in my review of the Safepacker holster from The Wilderness, over on Survival and Emergency Preparedness.
While waiting for me to come up with something of interest for this site, you might be interested in my review of the Safepacker holster from The Wilderness, over on Survival and Emergency Preparedness.
Labels:
administrivia,
emergency preparation,
guns shooting
Thursday, March 25, 2010
The Window War Just Got Hotter
And this time, it looks like the left is kicking it up a notch.
Link.
Cantor is a Republican, the House Minority Whip.
Most political violence in the US has historically come from the left. E.g., the Black Panthers, SDS, and the Weather Underground.
Most people on the conservative side of the aisle just want to be left alone to go on with their lives and to keep the fruits of their labor. It's the leftists who want to seize property of the productive class in some misguided attempt at redistributive justice. You can only push people too far before they snap. If the progressives keep this up -- and I see no indication that they are backing off -- they will experience backlash greater than they can imagine.
Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor said Thursday that his Richmond campaign office has been shot at and that he's received "threatening e-mails"....
Cantor said "a bullet was shot through the window" of his campaign office. The incident happened Monday, Fox News has learned, the latest in a rash of apparent threats and acts of intimidation against members of Congress.
Link.
Cantor is a Republican, the House Minority Whip.
Most political violence in the US has historically come from the left. E.g., the Black Panthers, SDS, and the Weather Underground.
Most people on the conservative side of the aisle just want to be left alone to go on with their lives and to keep the fruits of their labor. It's the leftists who want to seize property of the productive class in some misguided attempt at redistributive justice. You can only push people too far before they snap. If the progressives keep this up -- and I see no indication that they are backing off -- they will experience backlash greater than they can imagine.
Sharing Volumes Between Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
As anyone who's read this blog for awhile knows, I use a couple of different laptops. My primary machine is a Macbook Pro running Mac OS 10.6.2, while my secondary machine -- Hobbit -- is an MSI Wind netbook, currently running Windows 7 Ultimate.
The Mac is owned by my employer while I own the Hobbit. Since I use the Mac for personal purposes as well as work-related tasks (which is OK with my employer) I needed to have a reliable means of backup in the event I change jobs.
On my desk at work I have a Lacie Quadra drive which I use for Time Machine backups over FireWire 800 (it also supports FW400, USB, and eSATA). It would be pretty easy to restore my data from it to a personally-owned Mac. However, getting that data onto a PC would be a real chore, requiring the use of a Mac as an intermediary.
I also wanted a portable means of backup that would work with either machine and that wasn't dependent on a network which might not be available. I might also need to access my data using a Linux system. The cheapest means of doing so is a USB hard disk.
The USB disk I chose is a Western Digital Elements 640 GB USB 2.0 Portable External Hard Drive WDBAAR6400ABK-NESN
. It's a 2.5" drive in a plastic external case. It's bus powered, so no external power supply is required. Compared with the FW800 connection on my LaCie, or even a FW400 connection, USB 2.0 is noticeably slower for sustained transfers. However, this isn't much of an issue once the initial sync is done.
One problem you run into when sharing disks between Windows and either Mac OS X or Linux boxes is the NTFS file system. Linux has its own filesystems. Macs use HFS+. PCs use NTFS. Mac OS 10.6 includes read-only support for NTFS. Windows 7 cannot read HFS+ disks without third party software.
Luckily, there are solutions for sharing an NTFS volume between a Windows machine, and a Linux or Mac OS X machine. Th one I picked is called NTFS-3G and is available in a higher-performance, proprietary version, as well as a free open source version. As described in Wikipedia, "NTFS-3G is an open source cross-platform implementation of the Microsoft Windows NTFS file system with read-write support." NTFS-3G is availabele for OS X, Linux,
I installed the open source version of NTFS-3G on my MBP and so far it's worked very well. I have'n had problems syncing data between the Mac and the WD disk using CronoSync. Likewise, I am able to sync the WD disk to Hobbit, using Microsoft's free SyncToy.
Now I have a backup which I can share between my Macs, Windows and Linux boxes. That's pretty handy.
The Mac is owned by my employer while I own the Hobbit. Since I use the Mac for personal purposes as well as work-related tasks (which is OK with my employer) I needed to have a reliable means of backup in the event I change jobs.
On my desk at work I have a Lacie Quadra drive which I use for Time Machine backups over FireWire 800 (it also supports FW400, USB, and eSATA). It would be pretty easy to restore my data from it to a personally-owned Mac. However, getting that data onto a PC would be a real chore, requiring the use of a Mac as an intermediary.
I also wanted a portable means of backup that would work with either machine and that wasn't dependent on a network which might not be available. I might also need to access my data using a Linux system. The cheapest means of doing so is a USB hard disk.
The USB disk I chose is a Western Digital Elements 640 GB USB 2.0 Portable External Hard Drive WDBAAR6400ABK-NESN
One problem you run into when sharing disks between Windows and either Mac OS X or Linux boxes is the NTFS file system. Linux has its own filesystems. Macs use HFS+. PCs use NTFS. Mac OS 10.6 includes read-only support for NTFS. Windows 7 cannot read HFS+ disks without third party software.
Luckily, there are solutions for sharing an NTFS volume between a Windows machine, and a Linux or Mac OS X machine. Th one I picked is called NTFS-3G and is available in a higher-performance, proprietary version, as well as a free open source version. As described in Wikipedia, "NTFS-3G is an open source cross-platform implementation of the Microsoft Windows NTFS file system with read-write support." NTFS-3G is availabele for OS X, Linux,
I installed the open source version of NTFS-3G on my MBP and so far it's worked very well. I have'n had problems syncing data between the Mac and the WD disk using CronoSync. Likewise, I am able to sync the WD disk to Hobbit, using Microsoft's free SyncToy.
Now I have a backup which I can share between my Macs, Windows and Linux boxes. That's pretty handy.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Kipling Had Something to Say About This Mess
The Gods of the Copybook Headings
Rudyard Kipling, 1919
As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.
We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place;
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.
With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.
When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "Stick to the Devil you know."
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death."
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."
Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four—
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.
As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man—
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began:—
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
Rudyard Kipling, 1919
As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.
We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place;
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.
With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.
When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "Stick to the Devil you know."
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death."
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."
Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four—
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.
As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man—
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began:—
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)